If you can read this text, your browser is not interpreting this page as the designers intended. This may be because you are using an obsolete, non-standards compliant browser or you have Cascading Style Sheets disabled. Read more about Web Standards at Reactive.

text size: A- A+

The Briefing

Start up Guide Smart Co Awards Smart co blogs
Govt assist Govt assist Links Our Partners New Products

Email Alert

Sign up to receive an email each weekday alerting you to the latest news, tips, blogs, trends and big issues

More information
RSS feeds Podcasts

Ralph Lauren loses parallel import case

Wednesday, 6 February 2008

A Sydney retailer has triumphed in the Federal Court over international fashion house Ralph Lauren.

Ralph Lauren took court action to stop Adam Ziliani buying its shirts cheaply in the US and then selling them in Australia at a profit. The practice is known as parallel importing.

Ralph Lauren argued that because Ziliani was not a licensed owner of Ralph Lauren copyright in Australia, he should not be selling goods he bought in the US.

The Federal Court in Sydney yesterday ruled in favour of Ziliani. The court ruled that the “pony” logo on the shirts was in fact a “label”, making it exempt from copyright laws.

A Freehills intellectual property partner, Campbell Thompson, told The Australian Financial Review the case was significant in that it set a new precedent.

It means that the owners of logos can’t rely on copyright protection to stop parallel importation.

Inside Retailing

 


More articles from The Briefing

  • SME profits up: Economy roundup
  • CBA lifts home loan rate by 30 basis points
  • Facebook takes MySpace’s top spot in Oz
  • Rate rise won’t dent surging business investment
  • Labor IR bill to hit Senate speed bump
  • Soft landing or crash?
  • Tourism hit by dollar
  • WA franchise inquiry has kicked off
  • TOP OF PAGE