Cigarette giants in High Court battle
Tuesday, April 17, 2012/
The High Court has started hearing the claims by British American Tobacco and Japan Tobacco International against the Australian government’s plain packaging laws.
Most of the seven justices at the Canberra hearing questioned the tobacco companies’ claims that the plain-packaging legislation impinged on their property rights without just compensation, according to the Australian Financial Review.
Justice Susan Crennan questioned how their trademark could be acquired when they were still able to use their name on cigarette packets.
Chief Justice Robert French said the Commonwealth did not have a right to use the companies’ trademarks as a result of the world-first legislation, which passed parliament in November.
But senior counsel for British American Tobacco and Japan Tobacco International said the legislation deprived the companies’ trademarks of any value.
The three-day hearing centres on a requirement for olive-green cigarette packaging with graphic health warnings to be introduced late this year – if the new law survives the High Court challenge.
Be honest about your situation: How vulnerability helps businesses thrive Sue Parker DARE Group founder
Own it: The 10 things you need to do to manage your personal brand Lisa Stephenson Who Am I Projects founder
Six invaluable lessons: What 20 years in aged care taught me about being an entrepreneur Natasha Chadwick NewDirection Care founder
An entrepreneurial superpower: Eight tips to help develop resilience Adala Bolto ZADI Training co-founder
Going through a lull? Five areas you should invest in when sales drop Tamara Alaveras and Sonia Majkic 3 Phase Marketing co-founders
Pet-food lickers and changing-room strippers: Why you’ll never sell to people you don’t understand Ian Whitworth Scene Change co-founder
Blandification™ and the state of modern branding Jeffrey Oley The Offices co-founder
Why you should find the right role for the right person — not the other way around Bruce Stronge Outfit founder