Meriton Group dismisses employee after he attacked columnist Clementine Ford on Facebook

Meriton Group dismisses employee after he attacked columnist Clementine Ford on Facebook


Australia’s largest apartment developer has dismissed an employee after an investigation found he had used inappropriate language on Facebook.

Michael Nolan, who worked as a supervisor at Meriton Apartments, has left the company after calling columnist Clementine Ford a “slut” in a comment on her public Facebook page on November 25.

Ford subsequently published a screenshot of the comment along with a screenshot of the man’s Facebook profile two days later.

“I wonder if the folks over at Meriton Apartments are aware that a man listing himself as a supervisor for their business likes to leave comments on women’s Facebook pages calling them sluts,” Ford wrote.

Meriton Group has since written to Ford to inform her Nolan no longer works for the business.

“Meriton Group have now investigated the matter relating to the complaint made about Michael Nolan using inappropriate language on Facebook,” the company said in a statement to Ford.

“Meriton Group does not condone this type of behaviour. Michael Nolan was removed from the Meriton site on Saturday 28 November pending an investigation and as of 2.30pm today, 30 November 2015, he no longer works for Meriton Group.”

On her public Facebook page, Ford wrote that perhaps men will now think twice about calling women sluts online.

“These men have rarely ever faced consequences for their actions, but that’s starting to change,” Ford said.

“To anyone who suggests I have caused a man to lose his job, I’d like to say this: no. He is responsible for his actions. He is responsible for the things he writes and the attitudes he holds.

“It is not my responsibility to hold his hand and coddle him when he behaves in an abusive manner just because it might have consequences for him.”

Ford says it is unfair that women are often told to remain silent in case a man ruins his career.

“If you enjoy exercising misogyny online, you only have yourself to blame,” she wrote.

“I’d also like to personally say a big well done to Meriton Apartments for taking this so seriously. It’s very reassuring to see a business adopt this policy towards their staff and I appreciate their handling of the matter.”


What are the legal implications for dismissing an employee for inappropriate conduct on Facebook?


Andrew Douglas, principal at Macpherson Kelley, told SmartCompany there are several things employers must keep in mind when it comes to disciplinary action as a result of Facebook use.

“Firstly, if something is published on the public domain, then it is a matter which can be properly taken into consideration for employment,” Douglas says.

“Second, Facebook records the actions of a person during their employment and therefore the actions can be considered as part of the behaviours expected while employed.

“The third thing is that an investigation was undertaken which provided procedural fairness to the person [in this case]. So long as that procedural fairness was appropriate, there is no doubt the dismissal was a fair dismissal.”

Douglas says an employee calling any potential client of a business a “slut” on any basis is serious misconduct.

“A hotel provides people with a level of support and comfort and treats them with integrity, so any behaviour which is offensive must by its very nature be a breach of the contract of employment,” he says. 

SmartCompany contacted Meriton Group but a spokesperson referred to the statement sent to Ford and declined to comment further. 

SmartCompany was unable to contact Michael Nolan prior to publication.  


Never miss a story: sign up to SmartCompany’s free daily newsletter.


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments