Greens push for a publicly owned ‘People’s Bank’ as part of a big-government platform

Richard Di Natale, Bill Shorten, Malcolm Turnbull

Source: AAP Image/Dan Himbrechts, Mick Tsikas, Lukas Coch.

By Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

Greens leader Richard Di Natale on Wednesday will put forward a radical proposal for a publicly owned “People’s Bank” to give “affordable” services and inject “real competition” into the sector.

In an appeal pitched to the Greens’ base and voters on Labor’s left, Di Natale will tell the National Press Club the Greens “are the only party proudly arguing for a much stronger role for government. Today’s problems require government to be more active and more interventionist, not less”.

He will say the only current competition between the banks “is in their race to the bottom”.

“Through the People’s Bank, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) could offer banking services to the Australian public online, via Australia Post branches, and other contracted organisations,” he says in his speech, released ahead of time.

“In the face of ongoing misconduct and price gouging, it’s time for government to step in and ensure that there is a low-cost banking service, backed directly by the RBA, that is focused on the everyday savings and mortgage needs of customers.”

Di Natale’s address comes in the wake of the Greens’ failure to win the Batman byelection, after a campaign that saw damaging division among their local members.

He notes in the speech that the Greens increased their primary vote in the seat — which Labor held with an increased margin — but there has been criticism of his leadership following the byelection and the party’s poor performance at the recent Tasmanian election, its heartland state.

The People’s Bank policy taps into widespread community criticism of the banks, which can only be reinforced by the damaging material coming from hearings of the royal commission into the sector that is now running.

Under the People’s Bank proposal, homeowners would be able to borrow up to 60% of the value of their property directly from the RBA. With a minimum interest rate of 3% plus 0.5% administration charge, it would always deliver loans that householders could pay off faster and more cheaply compared with the present offerings from the big banks, Di Natale says.

“The People’s Bank will give current and future homeowners a much-needed advantage over investors,” he says.

“We have a housing crisis that has been created by governments. So now is the time for government to step in: through a People’s Bank, by ending policies skewed in favour of investors like negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount, and through a massive injection of funds for social and public housing.”

In his speech, Di Natale also embraces the concept of a Universal Basic Income (UBI), saying the current social security system is outdated, given the changing nature of work and increasing inequality.

The present arrangement “can’t properly support those experiencing underemployment, insecure work and uncertain hours”.

A UBI is needed to ensure “everyone has access to an adequate level of income, as well as access to universal social services, health, education and housing.

“A UBI is a bold move towards equality. It epitomises a government which looks after its citizens, in contrast to the old parties, who say ‘look out for yourselves’. It’s about an increased role for government in our rapidly changing world.”

The ConversationThe Greens are also advocating that parts of the electricity system be renationalised, starting with the interconnectors between states. They are “exploring a government energy retailer to compete in a re-regulated retail electricity market with no frills, easy-to-understand policies, transparent pricing and, best of all, cheaper energy bills”.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

NOW READ: New laws will prevent banks from inviting credit card users to increase limits


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Colin Spencer
Colin Spencer
4 years ago

How the Senator can assume that a government owned and operated bank could compete favourably with commercial banks is quite a mystery. Any publicly owned entity quickly becomes enmeshed with workplace standards common in public service organisations – taking four people to do the work of two, union rules, with silly wages and benefits, and obviously very little , or no, accountability. Privatised banks are the most efficient model.

4 years ago
Reply to  Colin Spencer

Colin – clearly that “efficiency” has come at the cost of oversight and compliance to Good Business Practices. How you can say that a Government Owned bank would have “obviously very little , or no, accountability” is beyond me with the rampant lack of corporate governance exhibited by the commercial banks recently.

Colin Spencer
Colin Spencer
4 years ago
Reply to  Boris

Too many levels of management or oversight, finishing with the most unreliable level of all – politicians on a mission to stuff things up. End result, it takes far too long to get a decision. The person you are dealing with has no decision making authority, and any venture relying on taxpayer funded capital tells you one thing: Privatise it.

SmartCompany Plus

Sign in

To connect a sign in method the email must match the one on your SmartCompany Plus account.
Or use your email
Forgot your password?

Want some assistance?

Contact us on: or call the hotline: +61 (03) 8623 9900.