Conflict of interest at play in managed investment scheme failures: Study
Monday, January 14, 2013/
The 155 failed and or frozen funds over the past six years had the one common factor – they all paid a research house to rate their product – according to research by the Association of Independently Owned Financial Planners (AIOFP).
The list covered all the failed and temporarily frozen registered managed investment schemes in Australia from January 2006 to November 2012.
They ranged in magnitude and in asset class from the the small to Great Southern Agribusiness which was valued at about $4 billion.
The AIOFP executive director Peter Johnston has suggested financial planners were in a position to stop the conflicted practise of using research houses that accept payments from product manufacturers.
“The ASIC can only do so much to intervene in commercial terms. Advisers are the only faction that should be paying research houses and must start refusing to use research houses who accept payments from product manufacturers,” he told the Wealth Professional website.
The association was established in 1998 to differentiate the independently owned practices from the institutionally owned practices.
Institutions owned around 60% of the advice market in 1998 and the figure is now approaching 80%.
In 2011 the AIOFP suggested every adviser should be levied a yearly fee, say $1,000, managed by ASIC to fund a panel of research houses who only supply information to advisers and are not permitted to accept any payments from product manufacturers.
The panel would then also scrutinise all PDS’s, which are not currently being checked for commercial viability by ASIC before market release.
“Unfortunately we have all been under the illusion that ASIC assess the PDS’s before market – they don’t, they continually say they don’t but no one is listening,” said Peter Johnston.
“[Research houses] are unofficially empowered with the decision-making role on which manufacturer’s products are good, bad or exceptional and whether they commercially survive.
“They have unfortunately become the unofficial ‘gate keepers’ of the industry with far too much power in our view,” the website, wealthprofessionals.com.au reported.
This article first apppeared on Property Observer.
LinkedIn engagement pods: Silver bullet or desperate ploy? Sue Parker DARE Group founder
Own it: The 10 things you need to do to manage your personal brand Lisa Stephenson Who Am I Projects founder
How to call your team into action with a winning presentation Emma Bannister Presentation Studio founder
The link between diet and mental health — and how to eat your way to wellbeing Kate Save Be Fit Food co-founder
From interactive videos to AI: The five marketing trends that will dominate 2019 Warwick Boulter Collaboro co-founder
Australia is leading the legaltech revolution, but what does this mean for lawyers, firms and clients? Jodie Baker Xakia founder
Why a video news release needs to be part of your PR strategy Leisa Goddard Adoni Media managing director
Want to catch more customers? Here's how to create a super sales funnel Jovana Vujnic Bumper Leads founder