JobKeeper’s time is up but the Coalition has plenty of fiscal firepower left

Centrelink end of JobKeeper

Source: AAP/Dan Peled.

If there was any reason to wind down JobKeeper at the weekend, the need for fiscal discipline wasn’t it.

Friday’s financial statement from Finance Minister Simon Birmingham showed the budget deficit running $23 billion under estimate; in February the budget deficit increased by only $700 million after rising by almost $18 billion in January.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ (ABS) examination of the Commonwealth government and Reserve Bank’s (RBA) accounts, also released last week, shows how borrowings by the Morrison government surged in the three months to last September, and then plunged in December (it was a similar story for state government borrowings).

The ABS showed the Commonwealth had net borrowings of $194.8 billion in calendar year 2020, which was “met by high demand from investors, particularly from overseas (due to their yields being higher than other internationally comparable bonds)”.

But, as the economy recovered better than expected, the government needed less money. Its deposits with the Reserve Bank reached a record $131.6 billion at the end of September quarter.

“In December quarter 2020, the government reduced their bond issuance, and net borrowing declined to $33.2 billion due to reduced JobKeeper and boosting cashflow for employers subsidies paid to businesses. The Commonwealth government funded the majority of these COVID-19 related subsidies and expenditure through their RBA deposit accounts. Despite this drawdown of deposits, government deposit assets remain at elevated levels ($100.4 billion as at December 31, 2020).”

That leaves the Commonwealth ample funds to continue with fiscal stimulus until June 30 at the reduced JobKeeper rate that started in December.

The state governments had a similar experience.

“State governments supported their economies through the COVID-19 pandemic through record net borrowing of $89.8 billion in calendar year 2020 … State governments financed this expenditure through the issuance of semi-government bonds … Excess borrowed funds saw deposit assets rise to a record high of $77 billion by the end of the September quarter, of which $1.9 billion was drawn down to help fund expenditure in the December quarter 2020.”

In other words, state governments had $75.1 billion in cash on hand at the end of 2020.

Just because the money has already been borrowed doesn’t mean governments should spend it, of course. But there are compelling reasons to avoid the mistakes made in Europe and the US after the financial crisis of withdrawing fiscal stimulus too early.

In any event, the pandemic isn’t over yet — Brisbane will go back into lockdown tonight while the government struggles with a painfully slow vaccine rollout.

The Reserve Bank insists wages growth is the key to returning to normal monetary policy, and there’ll be no growth without either the government embracing policies to deliver it — which looks highly unlikely when it continues to try to suppress wages growth — or unemployment drops to the low 4% and produces a labour market tight enough to force employers to stop profiting off workers’ productivity and give them a pay rise.

That may take longer than people think. The economic forecasts from US Federal Reserve two weeks ago suggest the Fed doesn’t believe — even with President Biden’s massive stimulus program and further infrastructure stimulus potentially in the works — that unemployment will return to pre-pandemic levels until 2023.

Those low levels of unemployment in the US — below 4% — were sufficient to drive modest wages growth, although nothing spectacular, and not enough to push up inflation.

A return to pre-pandemic unemployment levels here would simply entail more wage stagnation of the kind Australian workers have endured for the best part of a decade.

This article was first published by Crikey.

COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Derek
Derek
14 days ago

I’m struggling to remember the last time I read an article in Smart Company that I would have described as supporting a right wing philosophy on life. You are seriously turning into light weight Socialist Manifesto magazine. After over 10 years reading your output, I’m seriously considering ending my subscription.