Is Australian property overvalued? The experts have their say

Is Australian property overvalued? The experts have their say

Sydney prices skyrocketed last year, Harry Dent is diagnosing bubbles all over the country and housing affordability is on everyone’s mind. So Property Observer has turned to a range of industry experts for their thoughts on whether Australian property is overvalued.

 

Cameron Kusher – Senior research analyst, RPDatacameron_kusher_new

IF YOU’RE COMING TO AUSTRALIA FROM OVERSEAS, YOU MIGHT THINK OUR PROPERTY IS OVERVALUED – BUT THERE ARE GOOD REASONS FOR IT.

I don’t think you can say that the market is overvalued here in Australia. When you’re looking at examples of other countries, property here does look expensive. But there are good reasons why property prices are high in certain capital cities. Our population is so centralised, and job opportunities are centralised to a few capital city marketplaces – so there’s lots of competition for available stock. Plus there’s the fact that the supply of new housing and land for new housing is very restricted by our government, through their land releases.

So if you’re coming to Australia from overseas, you might think our property is overvalued  but there are good reasons for it.

Whether or not the price of Australian property is beneficial, and to whom, is another question for another day.

 

Catherine Cashmore – Market analystCatherineCashmoreProfile

YOU’D BE HARD PUSHED TO FIND ACCOMMODATION ON THE FRINGES OF OUR CAPITAL CITIES FOR LESS THAN SIX TIMES MEDIAN INCOME

It’s important to draw a distinction between property and land.

The raw cost of ‘building’ a home has seen very little increase over the past decade or so – and therefore is not overvalued. However – due to housing policy that encourages speculation into the established sector, and fails to ensure fringe land identified for residential development, is sold close to its agricultural value – the cost of an average subdivided plot has increased more than tenfold.

Meanwhile, in the late 1990s a typical first homebuyer’s budget would have secured a modest family home, in a reasonably facilitated suburb, for three times median income. Today you’d be hard pushed to find accommodation on the fringes of our capital cities for less than six times median income, and in Sydney, it’s closer to 10 times.

To some extent, lower mortgage serviceability rates buffer the effects for initial owners who generally work out how much they can borrow month to month, rather than concentrating on the total outstanding amount.

However, for prices to continue to increase, thereby inflating the ‘entry cost’ further, the system relies on debt being ‘ever more affordable’ to keep afloat, and the risk of still having outstanding mortgage debt to service upon retirement is significantly higher.

Today – due to the costs of an initial purchase, buyers enter the market later, have less time to pay off their mortgage, and often will end up reaching into their ‘super’ account upon retirement to clear the debt – after which, they obviously don’t want to see the price of their biggest asset – which has been a chain around their neck in terms of monthly mortgage repayments – drop.

To some extent, it’s a self perpetuating circle – voting for a politician who recognises an economy that relies on ‘ever rising’ house prices, is one that is ultimately set to fail, by way of an eventual sharp correction, is therefore not desirable for many owners.

But are prices overvalued?

  1. Land prices are inflated to multiples what they would be if used for other purposes – with sites often ‘land banked’ in lieu of any development
  2. Yields are generally low – averaging around 4% for a unit and 3.5% for a house.
  3. First homebuyers are having to find inventive ways to ‘enter’ the market if they want to gain a foothold onto the onerous housing ladder – borrowing a deposit, or being ‘first time investors’ and capitalising on family assistance to do so.
  4. Mortgage/household debt has gone from 30% – or one third – of disposable income in the 70s, to almost one-and-a-half years disposable income today.

Therefore, ‘Yes!’ land is overvalued. But will people keep buying it?

Of course – land is a necessity to all business and commerce, as well as our personal needs – and whilst buyers are able to service the debt, there will always a market for it.

However, take careful note – as time progresses, and values increase, this significantly valuable resource will increasingly fall into the hands of  ‘those who can’ and not necessarily ‘those who need’ – and the consequence of such, does not take much intelligence to guess.

Story continues on page 2. Please click below.

You can help us (and help yourself)

Small and medium businesses and startups have never needed credible, independent journalism and information more than now.

That’s our job at SmartCompany: to keep you informed with the news, interviews and analysis you need to manage your way through this unprecedented crisis.

Now, there’s a way you can help us keep doing this: by becoming a SmartCompany supporter.

Even a small contribution will help us to keep doing the journalism that keeps Australia’s entrepreneurs informed.

Trending

COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments