Tax office to scrutinise over $7 billion in car claims, concerned many are dodgy

car claims

The tax office has issued a warning about car-related expenses, outlining plans to crack down on the billions in claims made last year.

Concerned many taxpayers are filing dodgy claims for bigger refunds, the ATO said on Tuesday it would be taking a close look at the millions of work-related car expense claims it receives at tax time each year.

“We are still concerned that some taxpayers aren’t getting the message that over-claiming will be detected and if it is deliberate, penalties will apply,” ATO assistant commissioner Karen Foat said in a statement.

In 2017-18 more than 3.6 million work-related car expense claims were filed to the tune of $7.2 billion, figures which have clearly raised some eyebrows within the tax office.

“While some people do make legitimate mistakes, we are concerned that many people are deliberately making dodgy claims in order to get a bigger refund,” Foat said.

“We see taxpayers claiming for things like private trips, trips they didn’t make, and car expenses their employer paid for or reimbursed them for.”

In one example provided by the ATO a $4,800 claim triggered a red flag, with investigators finding the taxpayer was using a car service logbook as evidence of vehicle use rather than a dedicated work-use book.

After running the ruler over the case it was found the taxpayer hadn’t booked any work-related car travel that year.

“Simply driving between work and home is not enough to warrant a deduction. You must have a work-related need to travel while performing your job, like traveling from site to site or be required to transport bulky tools,” Foat said.

Businesses with workers using vehicles are being advised to help their workers dot their i’s and cross their t’s to avoid any additional tax office scrutiny in the coming weeks.

The ATO said on Tuesday it has “three golden rules” for work-related car expenses:

  • Trips between home and work cannot generally be claimed unless a worker is required to transport bulky equipment;
  • Workers can’t claim car expenses reimbursed by their employers; and
  • Ensure workers have the records necessary for proving their claims.

There are two ways to calculate deductions for car expenses, the cents per kilometre method and the log book method.

The cents per kilometre approach can be lodged for claims up to 5,000 kilometres and doesn’t require receipts, but employees must be able to show how they worked out their travel distance.

Logbook lodgers must claim based on the percentage of travel which is for work use and prove that claim with books showing how far they travelled and when.

Helping out workers this July 1

While business owners have plenty to think about themselves this tax time, workers are also navigating a myriad of changes.

The government’s protecting your super package comes into effect on 1 July and will turn off insurance on millions of super accounts which have been inactive for at least 16 months.

The changes are designed to prevent fees from eating up low balance super accounts but amid worries many employees are not aware of the impending changes, employers are being asked to help out.

“Many employees do not take an interest in their super, unintentionally opening multiple super accounts each time they start a new job,” Roll-it Super chief customer officer Jacinta Jones said.

“The super funds are required to communicate the changes to their members. They have been warned by ASIC to avoid encouraging members to maintain insurance policies they may not need.

“It is therefore important that SMEs, or their default super fund, do not spruik life insurance in the workplace.

“Good practice for employers is to simply raise awareness of the changes. A gentle nudge for employees to read the letter received by their super fund and to consider their life insurance needs would help them make an informed decision,” she said.

NOW READ: “Very rewarding”: Tax office recoups $500 million in revenue from phoenixing crackdown

NOW READ: The ATO’s horrible year: Scathing committee report lists 37 recommendations for tax office overhaul

You can help us (and help yourself)

Small and medium businesses and startups have never needed credible, independent journalism and information more than now.

That’s our job at SmartCompany: to keep you informed with the news, interviews and analysis you need to manage your way through this unprecedented crisis.

Now, there’s a way you can help us keep doing this: by becoming a SmartCompany supporter.

Even a small contribution will help us to keep doing the journalism that keeps Australia’s entrepreneurs informed.

Trending

COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mitchind
mitchind
1 year ago

They want every cent.

To bad the toil of many is wasted by the jokers. Thats the crime they get it in and waste.

They want it so government employee’s at all levels get 2+ time the pay increases of people in private. The people who really pay all this, get done over.

They want to send Peter Boyle away for lifetimes because he tried to help some taxpayers, he should be given a medal and his superiors fired.

They should have to abide by rules and laws, but are presently beyond what you and I have to obey. Govt needs to do something about this.

They are like vampires sucking us dry of our life.

The red tape gets worse. I reckon its great for the accounting industry as the AT and government palm off onto our accountants. Buts its juts another cost that makes us internationally less competitive.

Jarrah3
Jarrah3
1 year ago

Right. So for the many mature age people who hold superannuation accounts but have not been employed for at least 16 months, they now lose the life insurance policy via Super that they have been paying for many years… and they are now old enough (or perhaps not working due to illness, accident, etc) that they won’t be able to even get an alternate life insurance policy or won’t be able to afford the huge premiums. SO…. once again, while saying they (the gov’t) are doing something to ‘help’ people, they are actually simply helping BIG INSURANCE dump the liability associated with all those life insurance policies for mature age people. Insurance companies are the only winners here – if they sell you another policy it will be at much greater cost than the group policy via your super. If you don’t buy another policy then they are better off when you die.

Sounds suspiciously like how they had a royal commission into banking and the big banks were the only winners by getting the gov’t to nearly kill the mortgage broker industry. Most people won’t pay a mortgage broker directly so the banks win – people go to the banks directly and no bank commissions need be paid to a mortgage broker. People will shop around via multiple banks a lot less and the banks can behind-the-scenes collude to keep rates high, loan features low and generally do what they want as usual. The appearance of competition is just that…. a thin veneer.

When ANY gov’t of any political persuasion says they are going to do something to help people, get ready and reach for your wallet and be prepared to end up with less than you had before. Sadly…