Cutting the fuel exercise would harm energy security, despite the high petrol prices

petrol-fuel-excise

Source: Shutterstock, CC BY-SA.

Australian petrol prices are rising as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine pushes up global oil prices. It’s likely motorists will be paying more than $2.15 a litre for unleaded petrol within a few weeks.

In response, independent South Australian senator Rex Patrick has called on the federal government to halve the fuel excise on petrol for 12 months.

“Extreme petrol prices are an economic boa constrictor throttling household budgets,” he said last week. “We have to take the pressure off.”

The fuel excise is a fixed amount, currently set at 44.2 cents a litre. Halving it would therefore knock 22.1 cents off the price of petrol.

That would certainly offer some relief at the bowser, and to the economy. It would not, however, serve Australia’s economic and national interests in the longer term.

At a time when world events underline the importance of greater energy security, it would prolong our already alarming dependence on oil-based imports and undermine policies to shift the nation away from fossil fuels.

Calls to cut fuel tax arise whenever Australian petrol prices rise. This is despite Australian taxes — the fuel excise plus 10% GST — being among the lowest rates in the OECD and making little contribution to price increases.

All GST revenue is distributed to state and territory governments. The fuel excise is (theoretically) levied to pay for Australia’s road infrastructure.

In 2019-20 the government collected $5.6 billion from petrol and about $11.8 billion from diesel (much of which was reimbursed through diesel tax rebates).

The net revenue from all fuel excises, according to the Australian Automobile Association, is about $11 billion, a figure that hasn’t changed much for a decade.

Undermining decarbonisation

While making energy prices as cheap as possible does have some short-term economic logic, cutting the fuel excise would undermine the government’s longer term strategic goal to decarbonise the economy.

This is important both for Australia to meet its international obligations to take action on climate change and to look after the narrower national interest of preparing the Australian economy to compete in a carbon-constrained world.

Shifting away from fossil fuels to electric (and some hydrogen fuel-cell) vehicles is a key part of this. The Morrison government has acknowledged this with a target of 30% of all new car sales being electric by 2030. (Electric vehicles made up just under 2% of new car sales in 2021.)

While the government has committed $250 million to its Future Fuels and Vehicles Strategy to help achieve the target, its policy mostly depends on low-emissions vehicles achieving “pricing parity” with internal combustion engines by mid-decade, and for market forces to do the rest.

Slashing the fuel excise won’t do anything to help this plan become reality. It would also undermine state and territory government spending on policies to encourage the uptake of electric vehicles, through incentives such as stamp-duty waivers, free registration and rebates.

Taking energy security seriously

Moving away from fossil fuels is critical for addressing Australia’s growing energy insecurity. This entails two things: uninterrupted availability and affordability.

They are issues Senator Patrick cares about.

In mid-Febuary with Greens leader Adam Bandt and independentrs Andrew Wilkie and Bob Katter he hopped aboard an Australian-built electric bus for a photo opp in front of Old Parliament House.

Energy security doesn’t get much attention during normal times, but current events have underlined the dangers of being dependent on foreign supplies.

As Prime Minister Scott Morrison said this week, the world has entered a period of “profound strategic challenge and disruption”.

It is at the mercy of the international market and global supply chains for our supply security and fuel affordability.

Australia’s dependence on oil imports has been growing for at least a decade.

Closure of oil refineries along with declining oil production means we now import more than 90% of our needs. Yet we have abundant renewable resources to generate electricity and power low-emissions vehicles.

The solution to consumers being hostage to foreign oil supplies and volatile global prices will not come from slashing the fuel excise.

It will come from reducing demand for oil-based fuels through policies that promote local energy generation and switching to low-emissions vehicles — like the electric bus that Patrick sat in a just few weeks ago.The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Laura
Laura
2 months ago

What’s more important than decarbonisation is that low-middle income homes can afford to travel to work and that groceries and goods stay afforable. We know recessions follow record high fuel prices as they effectively act as a tax on spending. To ask these households to purchase electric cars is not reasonable at current prices. Households need afforable fuel NOW not by 2030…maybe. When you look and see that China controls a vast number of mines in Africa and Afghanistan that mine metals essential to battery production, you’ll see that oil is not the only source of energy that we can be held hostage by.

Sarah
Sarah
2 months ago

100% when will people wake up and realise we can’t burn dinosaur bones 4eva!

Close
SmartCompany Plus

Sign in

To connect a sign in method the email must match the one on your SmartCompany Plus account.
Or use your email
Show
Forgot your password?

Want some assistance?

Contact us on: support@smartcompany.com.au or call the hotline: +61 (03) 8623 9900.