How an algorithmic timeline could affect brands using Twitter
Monday, February 8, 2016/
Twitter’s chief executive Jack Dorsey has turned to his own social media account to hose down users’ concerns after it was revealed Twitter could soon implement an algorithmic timeline.
The potential overhaul would effectively act as an extension of Twitter’s “while you were away” function, meaning not all tweets will appear in chronological order.
The changes would focus on what Twitter thinks its users want to see, similar to how Facebook currently operates, according to Buzzfeed.
In a series of tweets over the weekend, Dorsey did not deny a revamped timeline was in the works, but did say it would not be implemented this week.
“I want you all to know we’re always listening,” Dorsey wrote.
“I love real-time. We love the live stream. It’s us. And we’re going to continue to refine it to make Twitter feel more, not less, live.”
Twitter is live. Twitter is real-time. Twitter is about who & what you follow. And Twitter is here to stay! By becoming more Twitter-y.
— jack (@jack) February 6, 2016
So what would an algorithmic timeline mean for businesses using Twitter to engage with both existing and potential customers?
An algorithmic timeline could affect real-time marketing as the instantaneous nature of Twitter is flipped on its head.
An algorithmic timeline may also mean brands with popular Twitter content could appear more on people’s screens, while those with less interaction could be hidden further down the timeline.
In an article for Forbes, technology writer Theo Priestley says this means users will be presented with more of the same content and will be less likely to be presented with new ideas.
“If you surround yourself with celebrities and like everything they say, that’s all you’ll ever see,” Priestly writes.
“Conversely, if you like tweets about local affairs and politics, then you’ll miss out on Kim Kardashian’s latest line of elastic band lingerie.”
According to Priestly, if Twitter’s timeline is to become less democratic, new brands or users may find it hard to gain traction.
“Following someone will become pretty much pointless since they don’t matter and their tweets will be buried amidst the inane babble you preferred before,” he says.
“The inevitable backlash may force Twitter HQ to implement more features to help filter out the noise.
“For example, creating a list of users is easy enough but currently there’s no way to arrange what you’ve liked into anything meaningful to reference in the future.”
Social media mishaps: Why businesses should think twice before cracking jokes online Catriona Pollard CP Communications founder
An ‘opportunity-hunting’ generation: Here's what millennial workers need and want Karen Gately Corporate Dojo founder
Spilling the beans: Why inviting someone to 'grab a coffee' is disingenuous and unnecessary Sue Parker DARE Group founder
The 10 most unemployable job titles on LinkedIn Ian Whitworth Scene Change co-founder
How Emily McWaters manages her Sydney-based business from Kangaroo Island Emily McWaters The Hamper Emporium chief
Why 'Orwellian' performance monitoring is crucial to building an ethical company culture Michael Kodari Kodari Securities chief