Poor impartiality around website platforms continues to dog smaller business

craig reardon

When it comes to website platforms or systems, I genuinely sympathise with the small business operator.

Because seeking advice on just what will work for you will yield a hundred different options and hundreds more opinions.

But as we have banged on about here time and time again, few of these opinions are impartial around the correct website platform for the unique needs of your business.

It’s really quite a unique and confusing situation.

Put a call out on your favourite social media group about the best website platform and four out of five people will recommend ‘open source’ website platform WordPress; 80% is compelling in anyone’s language, so it must be credible right?

Alas, in most cases, no.

What WordPress is good for

WordPress is indeed fantastic if your functionality need is unique – that is, you need it to work in a way that is unlike most other websites.

Special forms, calculations and customer rewards are great examples of this. In fact, getting some functionality built exactly to your specifications can be a brilliant asset for a business.

But the functional requirements of most small business are not unique. In most cases, their functionality requirements will have been done many times before and so are likely to be standard or ‘out of the box’.

In turn, common functionality means a lower price both upfront and in future, when it needs to be maintained or upgraded.

So why does WordPress come so highly recommended?

Show me the money

Quite simply because it rewards web developers much more than its competitors when it comes to accumulating ‘billable hours’.

In fact, its competitors offer web developers very little at all because their platforms require so little development labour – particularly for smaller business.

Developers also love that WordPress is ‘open source’ – i.e they can go in and alter the functionality at the ‘code’ or programming level to achieve the specific functionality they want.

Locking up the code

Company owned or ‘closed source’ platforms deliberately don’t allow this. The moment they do, they can no longer guarantee the performance of their own platform because a third party has come along and fundamentally altered their product.

It’s a situation that is rarely replicated in business circles. Very few businesses would allow enthusiasts to toy with their product so as it can be customised to their unique requirement.

But web development is a different beast. In addition to being populated with large software companies, it is also inhabited by literally millions of enthusiasts and small businesses, many of whom collectively are able to promote themselves to smaller business much more effectively than larger businesses.

And its these smaller players who make their presence felt in social media, often where large companies cant infiltrate.

Where companies can’t tread

For example, Facebook doesn’t allow organisations to join Groups, their forums for a wide range of special interests. Even if they did, the small business nature of many of them may preclude employees of larger organisations being admitted anyway.

So when it comes to gathering opinions, the voice of the larger and generally more secure and cost effective companies rarely gets a look in.

And asking a WordPress developer what the best platform is, is quite obviously, like going into a Ford dealer and asking what the best car is.

What’s more, many respondents in Groups like this don’t even bother to disclose their own conflict of interest in being WordPress developers and designers. Therefore, getting a genuine impartial opinion is nigh on impossible.

A billion flies

What often happens is that smaller business go with the (biased) body of opinion, only to end up with an expensive, insecure and difficult to use website that makes their job much harder and expensive than it really should be.

The only real way to ensure impartiality is to really interrogate the respondent around their technology preferences. Questions like how many platforms do you work in and which company-owned platforms do they also work in will can help uncover their particular bias.

Unfortunately in such an unregulated industry, the chances of getting truly impartial advice remain very slim indeed.

In addition to being a leading eBusiness educator to the smaller business sector, Craig Reardon is the founder and director of independent web services firm The E Team which was established to address the special website and web marketing needs of SMEs in Melbourne and beyond. 

You can help us (and help yourself)

Small and medium businesses and startups have never needed credible, independent journalism and information more than now.

That’s our job at SmartCompany: to keep you informed with the news, interviews and analysis you need to manage your way through this unprecedented crisis.

Now, there’s a way you can help us keep doing this: by becoming a SmartCompany supporter.

Even a small contribution will help us to keep doing the journalism that keeps Australia’s entrepreneurs informed.

Trending

COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ekard
ekard
4 years ago

could not agree with more – tools like squarespace / wix mightn’t be sexy or as customization for developers/tech geeks, but get the job done with 100% security and non technical knowledge…. I’m in the web dev space, but business to business, and see peeps recommending the wordpress all the time – I’ve used it in-house before, and just see it as being too bespoke/technical for 90%

D
D
4 years ago
Reply to  ekard

If we have reached the situation where WordPress is too technical for 90% of projects, we are almost at the bottom. The cookie cutter solutions (incl. WordPress) resulted in degradation of website development standards – just by appearance, most websites now look the same, and often not far off the templates they were based on. A custom solution done correctly today will truly set a business apart from competitors and be an excellent lead generation tool, but few people are willing to fork out the cash for proper planning, quality design & custom programming.

ekard
ekard
4 years ago
Reply to  D

Agree on sameness of WP cookie – and less Wix, but sites with Square looks very unique – you get what you pay for with them… The point of the article is that it’s value for money, while a custom L&F may be nice, what do you get long term. Move up from a simple WP/Wix through to SQ, and if you need more than that, and have $10k to burn, then go for it… Spend the $ on an App if you have something unique and got $50+ to spend, that WILL make you stand out…

Christine Sutherland
Christine Sutherland
4 years ago

I build my own sites and use WordPress with Xtreme Builder plug in. That allows me unlimited creative control over how any page on my sites looks and behaves. There is absolutely no need for customisation from scratch by a web developer, that will end up costing a fortune in maintenance and upkeep because it’s ideosyncratic.

What I do call in from time to time is graphic design in relation to branding issues, and coders if I occasionally find an incompatibility.

If web developers don’t find ways to leverage their time and reduce their cost to clients, they are going to lose a lot more business as even more intelligent developer plugins become available, and more businesses like mine bring the whole function in-house.