YouTube responds to the rise of long-form content. JOSH CATONE
By Josh Catone
Undoubtedly feeling the pressure from Hulu and other sites that have begun successfully streaming full length, professionally produced content for free over the web, YouTube over the weekend announced that it had begun testing full length content streams.
YouTube kicked off their test with classic TV content from CBS, including full length episodes of MacGuyver, Star Trek, The Young and the Restless, and Beverly Hills 90210 (the original, not the new remake; and unfortunately all this Hulu and YouTube content is not available for viewing yet in Australia).
The new full-length content feature will allow YouTube to legally host professionally created, long-form content, and to monetise it with pre-, post-, and mid-roll advertising in the way that Hulu has been successful.
YouTube currently dominates online video, accounting for about 44% of all US video streams. But without access to professional, full length content, the site could see that dominance start to slip.
Via the success of Hulu, users have demonstrated that not only are they interested in pro content, they’re also more open to monetisation via in-stream video advertising when the content is television or feature film length.
Audiences are also now turning more often to the web to view professionally created television content. The recent comedic send-up of US vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin by actress Tina Fey on Saturday Night Live, for example, was viewed 66% of the time after the live TV broadcast on DVRs and the web.
“This is the first time we’ve seen delayed viewing numbers this big,” said Amanda Welsh, head of research for TV data firm Integrated Media Measurement. “Usually it’s the other way around, with the overwhelming majority of viewing occurring during the actual broadcast.”
As Greg Sterling of Search Engine Land correctly points out, it was on the back of illegally uploaded commercial content that YouTube first rose to its current position of online video dominance.
YouTube will be placed at a competitive disadvantage in the future if it isn’t able to provide access to the commercial, full length content that users desire.
On the experience side, YouTube’s full length content effort feels the way they’re labelling it – like a test.
It’s not that the YouTube player is bad at delivering long-form content, it’s just not as good as what we’ve come to expect from Hulu, which set the bar pretty high.
Ads feel more clumsily integrated, there’s too much going on on the page for a truly cohesive viewing experience (though the new “lights off” feature helps), and the quality doesn’t seem up to par – though to be fair, that is harder to judge when the only full-length content they have available is from a decade or more ago.
The biggest omission, though, is that embedding is turned off, at least for the launch content. Embedding has allowed a lot of Hulu content to spread virally across the web. YouTube appears to be leaving the option of whether content can be embedded up to the publisher.
Hopefully YouTube can convince publishers to allow their content to be embedded, or else their service will have a hard time competing with Hulu and other full-length content providers.
Josh is the lead blogger for sitepoint.com. He covers all things new and exciting on the web and is based in Rhode Island, USA.
For more Webmaster blogs, click here